Home Services Audit Scorecard Results Tools About Book a Call
40%
Operational improvement
E-commerce fulfilment · Maylr
17%
Overtime reduction
Multi-shift · ~80 staff
22%
Pick rate increase
Retail fulfilment
28%
Faster goods-in to shelf
FMCG · high-throughput
Case Study 01 · Named client

Maylr — from intake chaos to a perfect routine in weeks.

Maylr E-commerce fulfilment Influencer & brand clients Audit + brief follow-up call
40%
Operational improvement post-audit · backlog reduced to zero
The Problem

Maylr provides fulfilment for influencer and brand e-commerce clients — a fast-growing segment with volatile intake patterns and high expectations on dispatch speed. The team had grown faster than its operational structure, and intake had become the bottleneck choking the rest of the operation.

The pattern was textbook: no formal goods-in process, no shift routine, persistent backlog that the team was constantly fighting rather than preventing. Effort was high. Output wasn't.

What the Audit Found
  • No structured intake process — every consignment was handled ad-hoc based on whoever was available
  • Backlog was being treated as the work, rather than a symptom of an unstructured process
  • No consistent shift routine, meaning the operation restarted from a different point every day
  • Team experience was good but compensating for the absence of a process, rather than executing against one
  • Equipment and zone allocation had grown organically without operational logic
What Changed

Maylr implemented the specific recommendations delivered in the post-audit brief — a structured intake process, a defined daily routine, and clear zone allocation. The team didn't need more capacity; it needed a system to operate within.

Within weeks of implementation, the backlog was reduced to zero and the operation reported a ~40% improvement across throughput and routine consistency. No additional headcount. No capital investment.

Case Study 02 · Named client · The cost of inaction

Print Post UK — a clean-looking process bleeding £50k+ in six months.

Print Post UK · Harlow Print fulfilment Audit delivered Findings not implemented
£50k
Estimated cost of inaction in the six months following the audit
The Problem

Print Post UK runs a fulfilment operation that looked clean from the outside. The floor was tidy, the team was experienced, the KPIs weren't catastrophic. But underneath that surface, the process was slow and structurally inefficient — and the cost of that was being absorbed quietly by the business, month after month.

The challenge wasn't visibility. It was complacency: the sense that because the operation wasn't on fire, nothing needed to change.

What the Audit Found
  • Process steps were structurally too slow — but each step looked acceptable in isolation
  • Inefficiency was being absorbed by individual effort rather than fixed by process redesign
  • The "clean" appearance of the operation was masking sustained financial drag
  • Multiple quick wins identified — each individually small, cumulatively significant
  • No structural pressure or incentive internally to act on findings that didn't feel urgent
What Didn't Change

The audit findings were delivered. The brief debrief took place. The recommendations were clear. And then nothing changed.

Six months later, a recalculation of the inefficiency identified at audit estimated more than £50,000 in cumulative operational losses — money that quietly left the business in the form of slow throughput, wasted effort, and the kind of process drag that nobody notices until somebody adds it up.

The lesson, on this site, is honest: the audit identifies the problem. The value is realised when you act on it.

Case Study 03 · Anonymised at client request

Overtime that wouldn't clear, regardless of headcount added.

Multi-shift operation ~80 warehouse staff Distribution
17%
Overtime reduction in 8 weeks
The Problem

The operation was running persistent overtime across all three shifts. The site manager had already added two additional headcount over the previous quarter with no measurable improvement. Leadership were attributing the problem to volume growth, but the numbers didn't fully support that explanation.

The internal view was that the operation simply needed more people. The underlying assumption — that the work volume was the driver — had never been formally tested.

What the Audit Found
  • Shift handover was consistently losing 25–35 minutes per transition due to undocumented informal processes
  • Work was being redistributed unevenly between shifts, with the late shift absorbing backlogs created earlier in the day
  • A recurring bottleneck in the goods-out flow was forcing operatives to wait rather than move onto the next task
  • KPI targets had not been updated to reflect a layout change made eight months earlier
What Changed

Shift handover was restructured with a standardised log. Work allocation between shifts was rebalanced. The goods-out bottleneck was resolved with a sequencing change that required no capital expenditure.

Within eight weeks, overtime had reduced by 17%. No additional headcount was required. The site manager described the root cause as "obvious in hindsight but completely invisible from inside it."

Case Study 04 · Anonymised at client request

A pick rate stuck at the same level for eighteen months despite multiple improvement attempts.

E-commerce fulfilment Retail warehouse ~55 warehouse staff
22%
Pick rate increase — same headcount
The Problem

The warehouse had been trying to improve its pick rate for over a year. Two rounds of team training had been run. Picking targets had been revised. A performance improvement process had been applied to several individuals. Nothing had produced a sustained improvement.

The working assumption was that the problem was people. It wasn't.

What the Audit Found
  • Slotting had not been reviewed since the SKU range expanded significantly eighteen months earlier — high-velocity items were stored in low-accessibility locations
  • Average picker travel distance per order was 40% higher than necessary given the current product mix
  • The pick path logic was configured for a previous warehouse layout and had never been updated
  • Pickers were spending an average of 6–8 minutes per shift locating trolleys and equipment before they could start
What Changed

The top 80 SKUs by velocity were reslotted to high-accessibility locations near the pick start point. The pick path logic was reconfigured. Equipment was given fixed staging positions at the start of each aisle.

Pick rate increased by 22% within three weeks of the changes — with exactly the same headcount. The training investment over the previous year had been addressing symptoms of a layout problem.

Case Study 05 · Anonymised at client request

A goods-in backlog creating drag across the whole operation.

FMCG High-throughput site ~120 warehouse staff
28%
Faster goods-in to shelf in 6 weeks
The Problem

The site was consistently failing to get goods onto the shelf within its target timeframe. The delay was creating downstream issues across picking, replenishment, and customer fulfilment. The goods-in team was working hard — the backlog was not a result of low effort or low staffing.

Senior management had already scoped a capital investment in additional goods-in equipment before the audit was commissioned.

What the Audit Found
  • The checking process was over-engineered for the actual risk profile of incoming goods — all deliveries were subject to the same full check regardless of supplier history
  • There was a single sign-off bottleneck in the putaway authorisation process that was causing goods to wait 45–90 minutes after checking before moving to shelf
  • Dock allocation was creating vehicle queuing that was delaying unloading start times by an average of 22 minutes per delivery
  • Goods-in staffing was weighted to the morning shift, but the majority of deliveries arrived in the afternoon
What Changed

Checking was tiered by supplier risk category — trusted suppliers moved to a lighter-touch process. The putaway authorisation bottleneck was resolved by delegating sign-off to team leaders for standard deliveries. Dock allocation sequencing was adjusted to reduce queuing.

The capital investment in goods-in equipment was not required. Goods reached shelf 28% faster within six weeks. The site manager later noted the dock scheduling issue was identified but not fully resolved — they subsequently adopted a dock scheduling platform to address it completely.

The operational track record behind the work

15 years inside UK warehouse operations. The experience behind every PainKiller engagement.

The PainKiller case studies above are real client engagements. The depth behind them is 15 years of senior operational experience across some of the most demanding environments in UK logistics — not as a consultant observing from the outside, but as the person responsible for the numbers. The four anchors below are the most significant.

Lidl GB · Head Office

Senior Warehouse Operations Consultant. Project work across 14 RDCs.

Worked at Lidl GB Head Office as a Senior Warehouse Operations Consultant, leading project work across the 14 Lidl regional distribution centres. Most warehouse consultants have never set foot in one RDC at this scale; working across 14 teaches you to look past local explanations and find the structural ones — which is exactly the diagnostic mindset PainKiller engagements are built on.

Role: Senior Warehouse Operations Consultant · Function: Cross-RDC operational improvement projects · Scale: 14 regional distribution centres
British Airways · Ground Operations

Aviation operational experience.

Operational experience at British Airways across ground operations — one of the few environments in UK logistics where the cost of process drag is measured in immediate, visible operational impact. The discipline that aviation operations demand of process design transfers directly to warehouse operations under volume pressure.

Function: Ground operations · Sector: Aviation
WHSmith · Distribution

Retail distribution operations.

Operational experience at WHSmith covering retail distribution. Retail distribution at scale combines high SKU variety, tight delivery windows, and persistent margin pressure — the same triangle of constraints that defines almost every UK warehouse operation today, regardless of sector.

Function: Distribution operations · Sector: Retail

A note on these results

On named clients, anonymisation, and honest results.

Maylr and Print Post UK are named with permission. The other three case studies are anonymised at client request — the sector, site size, and outcome figures are accurate; specific operational details have been described at a level that prevents identification. For qualifying enquiries, additional context can be provided under a brief NDA.

Print Post UK is included deliberately — to make clear that the value of an audit isn't the audit itself, it's whether the operator acts on it. The audit identifies what's wrong. The operator's willingness to change what they're doing determines whether it's worth more than the fee.

Results are not guaranteed to replicate. Every operation is different. What the audit does guarantee is that if savings aren't identified, you don't pay for the second instalment.

Get Started

Find out what your operation is actually costing you.

Two ways to start. Take the £99 Scorecard for a structured 25-question self-diagnostic across six operational health domains — instant 10-page PDF report. Or book a free 20-minute diagnostic call to talk it through.

Book Free Diagnostic Call Or take the Scorecard — £99 →

Ready for the full audit? Submit a booking enquiry directly →